STREET now open! Chicago | Los Angeles | Miami | New York | San Francisco | Santa Fe
Amsterdam | Berlin | Brussels | London | Paris | São Paulo | Toronto | China | India | Worldwide
 
New York

Mireille Mosler Ltd

Exhibition Detail
Looking Back
35 East 67th Street
New York, NY 10065


June 12th, 2008 - July 26th, 2008
Opening: 
June 12th, 2008 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM
 
Studio Visits: Studio Museum in Harlem (Joan Jonas), detail, Clifford OwensClifford Owens,
Studio Visits: Studio Museum in Harlem (Joan Jonas), detail,
2005, 2 photographs, 30 x 24 each
© courtesy Mireille Mosler Ltd
Museum Camouflage: Henri Matisse, Harvey OpgenorthHarvey Opgenorth,
Museum Camouflage: Henri Matisse,
1998, C-print, 11 x 14 inches
© courtesy Mireille Mosler Ltd
The wilds of Fairmont Park from the taxi 9pm from the train station from Washington, Karen KilimnikKaren Kilimnik,
The wilds of Fairmont Park from the taxi 9pm from the train station from Washington,
2002, Water soluble oil color on canvas, 9 x 12 inches
© courtesy Mireille Mosler Ltd
< || >
> ARTISTS
> QUICK FACTS
WEBSITE:  
http://www.mireillemoslerltd.com
NEIGHBORHOOD:  
upper east side
EMAIL:  
info@mireillemoslerltd.com
PHONE:  
212.249.4195
OPEN HOURS:  
Tuesday - Saturday, 10am - 6pm
> DESCRIPTION

Mireille Mosler, Ltd. is pleased to announce Looking Back, a summer group show with works by Philip-Lorca di Corcia, Karen Kilimnik, Simon Linke, Dave McDermott, Robert Melee, Jonathan Monk, Harvey Opgenorth, Clifford Owens, Nina Pohl, David Schutter, Molly Springfield, and Cheyney Thompson.

Most artists are interested in the artists who preceded them and in art historical concepts. Some artists and entire movements even abandon the claim to invention, to instead look at and explore the influence of historical art. In Memento Mori and Tease, Mireille Mosler Ltd. presented both old masters and contemporary works together. In Looking Back, contemporary artists reference their predecessors and earlier art historical movements. The references span centuries, from Dutch Old Masters via impressionism to early performance art. Rather than appropriating imagery, the artists integrate, and often question, the groundbreaking ideas specific to their referents with their own practice and treatment of medium. Sometimes, the references are not immediately visible, especially where artists are employing a more conceptual appropriation.

The 1984 photograph Gianni by Philip-Lorca di Corcia shows a reclining male figure in an open window frame, the cityscape of Rome in the background. The deliberately staged pose and the artificial lighting, combined with the panoramic landscape, evoke the complex picture planes of early Renaissance painting such as Jan van Eyck. In another photograph, Untitled (Welle II) by Nina Pohl, a detail of a Gustave Courbet painting is photographed in such a way that the surface resin reflects the light-source. While this seems amateurish at first glance, the reflection of the flash purposefully erases the original citation and illuminates the painted ocean.

The title of Karen Kilimnik’s The wilds of Fairmount Park from the taxi 9 pm from the train station from Washington, would not immediately reveal the eminent reference to early eighteenth century Romantic landscapists. Kilimnik often introduces historical events combined with present pop culture. Here she depicts a recent trip, reminiscent of the plein air French Barbizon painters like Corot. Also concerned with nature and representing landscape was the nineteenth century art critic John Ruskin, who is the subject of Molly Springfield’s meticulous drawings after photocopies of his treaties. Ruskin believed that art was essentially concerned with communicating an understanding of nature and that authentic artists should reject inherited conventions in order to study effects of form and color by direct observation. Although Springfield does not follow Ruskin’s directions by going into nature, she delivers his thoughts in an even more direct way.

Dave McDermott creates collages and watercolors on the pages of an aged 1970s Claude Monet catalog. The iconic persona of Monet, strolling the grounds of Giverny, is replaced with McDermott’s own exploration in perception and light, obscuring the normally recognizable references and commenting on how Monet’s work is perceived today. Jonathan Monk also alters and obscures original meaning in Everything and Nothing, an ink on paper diptych referencing Alighiero e Boetti’s “Lavori Biro” (ballpoint pen drawings). Like the Boetti, Monk’s drawings are composed of fields of tiny ballpoint-pen markings that conceal underlying text. However, Monk’s drawing does not allow random letters and punctuation to be exposed, thus revealing no clues to the reading of the text.

Simon Linke takes a more direct approach by appropriating a detail of a John Currin painting, as published in a Gagosian advertisement in Artforum. Linke’s consistently appropriated paintings from Artforum depict art as it is represented in the commercial space of an advertisement, and seem to reclaim art from commerce by painting it in a more formal manner. In contrast, David Schutter’s painting Untitled (after GSMB vRi) explores the underlying structures of Rembrandt’s Joseph and Potiphar’s Wife from 1655 in the Berlin Gemäldegalerie. Schutter paints the composition from memory in complex grey tones, reconstituting the brushwork and use of light and color of the Dutch Master.

The sculpture of Robert Melee combines two very different traditions: Ab-Ex painting and traditional sculpture. By coating a mannequin in canvas, then plaster and enamel paint, Melee’s sculpture becomes an imposing and featureless colossus. Melee mixes the arbitrary process of a Jackson Pollock with the monumental and figurative bronzes of Auguste Rodin. Cheney Thompson’s still life paintings from the series 1741, seek to psychically commune with Jean-Baptiste Simeon Chardin. Chardin’s paintings of the 1730s and 1740s often depict children in action, like a boy blowing bubbles. Thompson undertakes a new type of history painting by omitting the narrative, while leaving the constructions of perspective in tact.

Clifford Owens and Harvey Opgenorth both explore and employ performance art. Owens’s large drawings were created through a collaborative effort with Joan Jonas in a performance at the Studio Museum in Harlem in 2005. After strapping charcoal and graphite to Owen’s arms and legs, Jonas used Owen’s body as a drawing instrument. Documentation of Opgenorth’s one hour performances Museum Camouflage presents the artist attempting to camouflage himself in front of well-known works of art. We see Opgenorth facetiously standing in front of a Mark Rothko in the Chicago Art Institute, a Christopher Wool in the Milwaukee Art Museum, a Matisse at MOMA, and an Ellsworth Kelly painting in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.


Copyright © 2006-2013 by ArtSlant, Inc. All images and content remain the © of their rightful owners.