|
Interview with Mark Dutcher
Article Type: interview
Articulate, emotional and committed, Mark Dutcher is a painter's painter. Dutcher is deeply immersed in the process and act of painting. He is one of those artists whose drive to create is demanding and relentless. Over time, his work has grown and matured, and he easily walks that line between abstraction, expressionism, surrealism and pop. We spent a couple of hours in his studio talking about his working methods, influences and challenges. As I sat there, thoroughly engrossed in our conversation, my eyes roamed through the dense and beautiful surfaces of his paintings and the Dutcher spell slowly took hold. Mark Dutcher is represented by Steve Turner Contemporary in Los Angeles. To learn more about Mark, visit his ArtSlant Profile (here).
Georgia Fee: You mentioned your father a number of times, as well as Philip Guston. How have these two men affected your work? Do you see any connection between them, or in the ways they impacted your development as an artist? Mark Dutcher: My father is a painter and a hermit. I have only met him a handful of times. He lives in a house that he painted "camouflage style" near Bishop, CA. His absence has been a presence, if that makes any sense. Philip Guston has been a father figure. He taught me how to paint. Recently I have been interested in his late abstractions , the ones that are aching to become narrative. I have also been looking at Joan Mitchell paintings from the 60's. She is my painting mother.
GF: In describing your work you referred to yourself as a symbolic painter, and we talked at length about the symbols in your work: the hourglass, the heads, the pipes, hats and boots (to name a few). Now you have a large "X" beginning to take hold. Are these talismanic? Acts of private importance or protection? Why do you keep returning to the same symbols? MD: Some of my first paintings were of cups, vases, bottles, urns; symbols that I painted over and over. The paintings were about emptiness and isolation and about things needing to be filled. I was influenced at the time by Susan Rothenberg - the idea of reducing the painting to one symbol and then breaking that symbol apart. I was also looking at Guston's late paintings and the idea of non-linear narrative surrounding symbols and accumulating over a series of paintings. Now all my symbols are colliding together. A mass of symbols whirling about the canvas and the universe. Maybe the "X" is to prevent them from spilling into the room, or an x to prevent further destruction or possibly an x to mark the spot. GF: In addition to your use of symbols, you employ a lot of techniques that blur or cover-over or disguise. How does "mystery" play into your work? Are you hiding or revealing? What about your viewer - are you engaging in some sort of dialogue with them? MD: I am opposed to the idea of preciousness in painting. I am all for decay and disintegration. I want the painting to be weathered and layered. I usually go into my studio and destroy or paint out what I had painted the day before. I have an urge toward self-destruction. Most days I act that out in the studio. I am very interested in the melancholic idea of beauty - that nothing lasts. I want the viewer to be a part of the painting rather than reading it as a novel or story. I think that is why I paint so large, so people can enter the work. GF: People have written about loss and death in relationship to your work. And yet, there seems to be an outpouring of almost chaotic energy in the new paintings. Is the poetry of Mark Dutcher changing? MD: The new paintings are about the myth of the West and western expansion. The emptiness has been filled. There is no room to expand. The paintings are bursting . They are filled with debris-boots, cowboy hats, wagon wheels, paint: a carnivalesque explosion of junk.
GF: Many people have said that self-doubt is one of the most difficult things to deal with as an artist. Do you experience this? What are your solutions? MD: Most days I am in the studio. I paint all the time. The self doubt just becomes part of the painting. I think it helps that my paintings are not planned out. I usually have a starting point, an idea that I don't hold myself to. GF: What 5 words would best describe your work? MD: Today. I. Want. To. Live. (how about a little personal stuff...) GF: Heart throbs? Heroes? MD: Philip Guston, Georg Baselitz, Susan Rothenberg. Manuel Ocampo. Anselm Kiefer, Sherie Franssen, Chris Martin. Amy Silman. Lucio Fontana. Schnabel. Basquiet. De Chirico. Joan Mitchell. GF: What's your music - bedside reads? MD: Sigur Ros. Joy Division. Explosions in the sky. Radio Head. Sylvester. Patty Smith. Judy Garland. And the poetry of Paul Celan and Maw Shein Win. GF: The perfect moment, the one you could do over and over? MD: Paint. - ArtSlant Founder, Georgia Fee (All images: Courtesy of the Artist and ArtSlant.com. Mark Dutcher studio shots, Feb. 2008.)
|
QUICK LINKS
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © 2006-2008 by ArtSlant, inc. All images and content remain the © of their rightful owners.







add to mylist
email
print
add to del.icio.us
digg this
stumble it!